Is Sabbath for Christians Saturday or Sunday?

The ShofarIt’s Sunday evening here, and no doubt many Christians across the country and the world would have already attended church services or are preparing to attend one.

Which makes it a perfect opportunity to discuss what some have asked me about a statement I made in my old blog on the fact that I believe we Christians should keep the sabbath on Saturday instead of Sunday.

I am not a Seventh-Day Adventist; it just happens that I agree with them on this point about observing the sabbath on Saturday instead of Sunday.

So why do most churches observe what they call “The Lord’s Day” on Sundays?

The Reasons Why

From what I understand, there are basically two reasons why:

  1. Church tradition has most people believing that Christ was resurrected on Sunday after His crucifixion on a Wednesday afternoon
  2. Constantine, the Roman Emperor who claimed to have converted to Christianity (but in fact created a false church) decreed Sunday to be the day of worship. At the Council of Laodicea, in A.D. 363, the following formal decree stated: “Christians must not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, resting rather on Sunday. But, if any be found to be Judaizing, let them be declared anathema from Christ.”

Before we move on to examine each of the two reasons why, it’s important to also note that Sunday has always been sacred to the pagans that worship the sun. And if you think Christian festivities such as Easter and Christmas are truly Christian, this might shock you — Easter is actually an adoption of the festival of Ishtar, while the latter an adoption of Saturnalia.

Christ Was Resurrected On The Sabbath

Let’s first look at the church tradition that purports that Christ arose on Sunday after His crucifixion. To do that, let’s all turn our attention to Matthew 28:1, John 20:1, Mark 16:2, Luke 24:1.

Firstly, note that Scripture tells us that the women went to the sepulcher early on the first day of the week, when it was still dark.

Next read Luke 24:6, Mark 16:6, Matthew 28:5-6 where the angels reassured the women that Christ was no longer in the sepulcher, but is risen.

Now let’s put these facts together — the women went early to the sepulcher the day after the Sabbath (Sunday), found Jesus’ body missing, and were then reassured by the angels that Christ is risen and was gone. When does that place Christ’s resurrection?

The sabbath, no doubt.

Christ appeared to His apostles the next day (Sunday, and which most churches observe as “The Lord’s Day”) but was risen the day before (sabbath)!

The Roman Connection

To understand what impact the decree made in A.D. 363 at the Council of Laodicea literally had, we must first understand that the word “anathema” when applied to anyone in those times was almost a death sentence.

If a person is proclaimed as “anathema” by the church, he is accursed and deemed a heretic, an accusation that guaranteed arrest by the state and torture, which, unless he recanted, continued until death.

The first question we must ask is this: does the Council of Laodicea have any Biblical basis for proclaiming Sunday to be the sabbath instead of Saturday, the seventh day of the week, as God had ordained?

The straight and simple answer is an emphatic no. There is not one verse in the Bible that instructs us to observe the sabbath on Sunday instead of Saturday!

Even clerics in the Roman Church admit to this lack of Biblical basis:

“From this same Catholic Church you have accepted your Sunday, and that Sunday, as the Lord’s day, she has handed down as a tradition; and the entire Protestant world has accepted it as tradition, for you have not an iota of Scripture to establish it. Therefore that which you have accepted as your rule of faith, in adequate as it of course is, as well as your Sunday, you have accepted on the authority of the Roman Catholic Church.”

– D.B. Ray, The Papal Controversy, p. 179, 1892

“We move from the ‘Sabbath’ to the ‘first day after the Sabbath’, from the seventh day to the first day: the dies Domini becomes the dies Christi!…By contrast, the Sabbath’s position as the seventh day of the week suggests for the Lord’s Day a complimentary symbolism, much loved by the Fathers. Sunday is not only the first day, it is also ‘the eighth day’, set within the sevenfold succession of days…”

– Pope John Paul II, Apostolic Letter, Dies Domini, Vatican, May 31, 1998

Shocked? Flabbergasted?

If it still hasn’t sunk in, these quotes simply illustrate the plain fact that the Roman Church substituted Sunday for Saturday as the sabbath just because they think they can, as the “one true church of Christ”. Lest you forget, Christ is the head of the Church, not the pope, or bishop, or pastor or council of elders!

And he put all things under his feet and gave him as head over all things to the church, 23 which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.

Ephesians 1:22-23

And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent.

Colossians 1:18

What Does Christ Jesus Say?

If there is not an iota of Biblical basis for the sabbath to be observed on Sunday, then surely there must be reinforcement of keeping the sabbath on Saturday even during Christ Jesus’ ministry on earth?

There are, but most have not taken note of them.

Christ Jesus did not abolish the old Laws, they still are valid, and that includes keeping the sabbath on Saturday!

If there is one thing most Christians have yet to understand, it is that Christ Jesus was there, i.e. existed before the earth was even formed. It was through Christ Jesus and for Christ Jesus that we came into being. Read John 1, Scripture is very clear that Christ Jesus was there from the very beginning!

Paul knew very well the significance of this. So if Christ Jesus was there from the very beginning, it is He who is the Lord of the Sabbath, and it is also He who ordained that the seventh day be made holy and a day of rest for mankind!

Consider:

And he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.”

Mark 2:27-28

Hold on, did Christ Jesus say that the Sabbath was made for “man”?

The Sabbath Is For The Gentiles Too, Not Just Jews

Scripture is very clear on this — Christ Jesus made it plain that the sabbath is for man, i.e. both Gentiles and Jews, and not just Jews only!

What Is Your Choice?

Bear in mind that it is possible to worship God in vain! Christ Jesus put it plainly so:

in vain do they worship me,
teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.’

You leave the commandment of God and hold to the tradition of men.”

And he said to them, “You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment of God in order to establish your tradition!

Mark 7:7-9

You now know the fallacies of man-made rules and traditions governing worship, and it is now up to you to decide whether to reject man-made traditions and obey what Scripture teaches, or continue disobeying.

I have made my choice, but unfortunately have yet to find a local church that encourages observance of the sabbath as Scripture teaches.

Shalom.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  1. Edmund’s avatar

    I agree with you, accept there are many different churches out there that observe the sabbath, And many that observe all the holy days of God. There are many that disregard all the false triditions of men.

    Reply

  2. Free’s avatar

    Amen to all of that!

    I an not SDA either, but began observing Sabbath in February of this year. I don’t advertise it, but go about quietly cherishing the weekly Sabbath. I do, however, note how angry some Christians are towards others who profess salvation in Christ, yet observe Sabbath. Oh how we esteem our man-made traditions. :(
    I am blessed to have found a church that holds Saturday AND Sunday services. I sincerely hope that you find an assembly to worship with soon too.

    Take care,

    Free

    Reply

  3. Sicarii’s avatar

    @Edmund:

    Thank you for the comment. I do accept that some among us will continue to observe Sunday, but I hope they do read the Bible and find out for themselves that they have been misled. Ours is the age of literacy and information, there’s no reason not to be aware!

    @Free:

    How can other Christians be angry if you choose to observe the Sabbath as it should be on Saturday? Don’t they know full well that even our Lord observed the Sabbath during His ministry on earth? If Sabbath were indeed to be abolished, then surely Jesus would have said something to that effect, but we all know He didn’t.

    Our Lord did say some things regarding Sabbath, but those words were meant to correct the wrong observances and, note here, chide the man-made rules the religious leaders drew up for the observance of Sabbath.

    I am puzzled by the displeasure these Christians display.

    Reply

  4. Observe the Sabbath day, to keep it holy - Jarkko Laine - Insanely interested’s avatar

    [...] Yesterday was a holy day for Jews. Different days, same purpose to rest and keep the day holy. There is always some debate going on about which day we should be keeping holy, but all the while we aren’t treating any day of the week any differently than the others. [...]

    Reply

  5. ET’s avatar

    This was the issue which eventually made me fell out with my pastor and a few elders. Don’t be surprised Sicarii, a few pastors and reverends I know hold on to this belief strictly and sees me as a “threat” to their teachings. My auntie even had a huge argument infront of the entire ministry for this particular Sabbath issue.

    My argument was fairly simple, that there wasn’t any specific Words to reinstate that we conduct worship on the day after Jesus was resurrected and not on the day of resurrection itself. Many believes that New Testaments points that the Words have changed but it is interesting for me to highlight that New Testaments are to correct the incorrect translation, rather than the context and usage of Words.

    It seems that pastors are handing out teachings which are not in accordance with biblical reference, which is why I haven’t been housed in a single church. I love to travel around and hear what each church have to say.

    Reply

  6. Sicarii’s avatar

    Like you, I don’t exactly belong to one church but I can’t say that I’ve traveled around looking for a new one.

    Attending church is basically for fellowship, in my opinion — just as people need to belong to a community of like-minded individuals, a church fulfills that need within each of us to belong.

    Which church you attend matters, but I believe what matters most is one’s own relationship with God.

    Reply

  7. TruthofmyKing’s avatar

    You are 100% correct. I believe that many doctrines currently held by the “modern” reformed church (including this one of the Sabbath) came from the unholy decrees of men from early A.D. councils. Upon careful consideration of the Holy Scripture most all of them can easily be found to be false teachings, that is, if we just believe what is written by the prophets and inspired writers.

    However many do not want to deny around 2,000 years of “Christianity”, which, as we all know, has held these traditions as true for so long. There argument is “How can ALL those people be wrong.”

    Well, I believe it is the same way only 8 people made it into the ark before God destroyed the earth the first time. I bet the idea of a global flood seemed a little strange for the people of that day.

    Truth is not governed by popularity.

    This is a great post, I am going to e-mail it to a few. Thank-you!

    For the Truth of my King

    Reply

  8. Shalene’s avatar

    You know I only recently started observing a Sabbath. That is, though I went to church every Sunday, I did not necessarily take a day of rest. Now I do. The thing is, I did not know until recently that Sunday was changed as the “official” day of rest until about 1 month ago. This is the first time anyone has pointed out exactly why the Sabbath should actually be on Saturday instead of Sunday. Oh well, it doesn’t make much difference now, I’m going to be going to church on Saturday AND Sunday. My church offers both soon, and since I am on the Worship and Arts team, if I’m on stage that week, I’m there for all 3 services (2 on Sunday.) So I wonder then, would it be a sin for me to continue to observe the Sabbath on Sunday? And what exactly would you say (or does the bible say) constitutes the Sabbath. These are rhetorical questions. I’m really just thinking with my fingers. :) I think I’ll do a post on this. You’ll have to come check it out.

    Reply

  9. Sicarii’s avatar

    TruthofMyKing:

    Thank you for visiting my blog and your comment.

    I totally agree with you. It is really funny but sad at the same time that people choose to believe the traditions of men when the Bible so specifically tells us that they are nothing against God’s Word.

    During His ministry on earth, our Lord often chastised the Pharisees and Sadducees for imposing their traditions on the people.

    What is 2,000 years of tradition compared to the Word of God? Nothing, and totally empty!

    I hope your email helps spread the message that we are to obey God’s Word. Our Lord Jesus Christ said that not all who call him “Lord, Lord” will enter the kingdom of Heaven, but those who do God’s Will.

    Reply

  10. Sicarii’s avatar

    Shalene:

    Those are some questions I’d love to have answers to too. I very much look forward to your post on this subject.

    Reply

  11. Shalene’s avatar

    Hi Sicarii, I wrote my post. I linked back to you within it, only because you were the inspiration for me finding the answers that I found. You will find that I ultimately disagreed with your post, but I hope you will find my disagreement to be respectful, for that was the spirit in which it was written. May God bless you, my brother. I hope to have many more interactions with you. You may find my post at http://msp31wannabe.blogspot.com/2007/08/observing-sabbath-by-shalene-kearney.html Thank you for sharing with us your thoughts on this.

    Reply

  12. Sicarii’s avatar

    Shalene,

    Thank you for the link back, it is very much appreciated.

    I’ve read your post and I am glad you disagreed with me. Why? Simply because I always like to read another’s opinion on any topic, and I always love civil open debate on issues because it is from there that we learn more about the issue and, more importantly, things about ourselves that oftentimes we do not realize are there.

    RE: your post, I think I have a comment or two, but let me organize my thoughts before I post them. :-)

    Shalom, sister.

    Reply

  13. Shalene’s avatar

    Sicarii,
    I’m glad that you took my disagreement in the spirit for which is was intended, and that you are taking the time to think about and organize your thoughts before responding. I look forward to our furthered discourse on this subject. Shalom to you as well, brother.

    Reply

  14. Casey’s avatar

    Isaiah,

    I agree with you that Jesus likely rose from the dead on Saturday. However, I also do not think we need to place too much emphasis on the particular day of the week. The Bible never explicitely states that the Sabbath must be on a particular day of the week. The point of the Sabbath is for us to rest one day a week as God did when he created the universe. Jesus said, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath” (Mark 2:27). We need to rest one day a week, but I don’t think it matters which day.

    For me, my sabbath alternates between Saturday and Sunday. My church has services on both days. I make sure not to do any work on my sabbath.

    Reply

  15. Sicarii’s avatar

    Casey,

    I tend to go with Friday sundown to Saturday sundown as the Jews observe. I don’t want to observe Sunday because the harlot changed it to Sunday with intention to prove her ability to change what has been ordained, thinking herself the self-appointed true Church. :-)

    Reply

  16. Casey’s avatar

    You might try to find an SDA church, then. They used to be off their rockers, but they seem to have repented and gotten back on the straight and narrow. Do you refuse to celebrate Christmas and Easter as well? I mean, how far do you intend to take your objections to the Catholic church? I choose to disregard who started the tradition and allow God to know my heart. The date or day of the week that we observe these things seems trivial to me.

    Reply

  17. Sicarii’s avatar

    I disagree with some of the statements of faith at the SDA church, so no I won’t.

    As for Easter and Christmas, you are right — I don’t really observe them as they are purported to be. That said, Easter and Christmas can be any day and it is everyday too.

    For Christ is risen, and seated at the right hand of God!

    Reply

  18. Casey’s avatar

    I think it might be difficult to find a church with which you completely agree. I have Baptist leanings, but I currently attend a non-denominational church. The essential thing for salvation is to confess Jesus as Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead. There are no other requirements for salvation, so you can still fellowship with other believers even if they don’t agree with you on what day to observe the sabbath or whether they think baptism should be done by sprinkling instead of immersion. Just because they’re wrong on what day of the week to worship doesn’t mean you should deprive yourself of Christian fellowship.

    Reply

  19. Sicarii’s avatar

    You’re right, Casey, and I am looking for a church to attend on a regular basis. I have been meaning to get off my fat ass to do that but just haven’t done enough of it I guess.

    Come in here and help kick my ass to do it. :-)

    Reply

  20. Casey’s avatar

    I actually found mine by sitting on my @$$. :) I searched for churches in the area on the Internet and found one that I thought might be suitable. I sent off an e-mail to the pastor with my most important issues:
    1. Do you believe in a literal six-day creation?
    2. What is your position on Israel?
    I’ve found that if the answer is in the affirmative for #1 then most of the other issues are settled.

    Reply

  21. Sicarii’s avatar

    I might give that a try then!

    Thank you for kicking my ass without getting me to actually move it, lol!

    Reply

  22. Casey’s avatar

    Ha, ha. You’re too funny. One of these days I’m going to visit Singapore so we can chat in person. (I’ve admired Singapore ever since that idiot American kid got caned for vandalism.)

    Reply

  23. Sicarii’s avatar

    You do that, brother, and I think you’ll be here first before I can save enough. The Yen is much healthier than the Singapore dollar. :-)
    I’ll be honored to show you around!

    You mean Michael Fay?

    Reply

  24. Casey’s avatar

    Yeah, that’s the punk.

    I have some other friends in Singapore that hopefully I’d be able to catch up with, too.

    Reply

  25. Sicarii’s avatar

    That’s great! I can get to know some new people too if we all meet up. :-)

    Reply

  26. Y H Koh’s avatar

    Hi, Sicarii,

    Regarding your post on whether Christ was resurrected on the sabbath, I think there is a misunderstanding on when the Jews start their days. It is clear that the Jews has a different system from ours. The Jews start their day in the evening instead of morning. So the sabbath will start in the even of our Friday. When that Scripture tells us that the women went to the sepulcher early on the first day of the week, when it was still dark, in the Jews system, it is already in the early morning of Sunday. Even if you think that the women leave in the evening of our Saturday, it
    is in fact the begining of the first day of the week of the Jews.

    You also mention that Church tradition has most people believing that Christ was resurrected on Sunday after His crucifixion on a Wednesday afternoon. Christ is not crucified on Wednesday. It should be Friday at around 3pm. (Mat 27:46 About the ninth hour Jesus cried out in a loud voice, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?– which means, My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? - The ninth Hour - t It is universally agreed that in the Synoptics the hours were numbered from sunrise, approximately 6:00 A.M. This would mean that Christ was crucified at 9:00 A.M. and the preternatural darkness lasted from 12:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M.)

    Allow me to bother you with a table showing the last four days of the passion week taken from the Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties

    THURSDAY: Passover, Last Supper
    Mt 26:17-30; Mk 14:12-26; Lk 22:7-23; Jn 13:1-30
    In an upper room, Jesus prepared both himself and his disciples for his death. He gave the Passover meal a new meaning. The loaf of bread and cup of wine represented his body soon to be sacrificed and his blood soon to be shed. And so he instituted the “Lord’s Supper.” After singing a hymn they went to the Garden of Gethsemane, where Jesus prayed in agony, knowing what lay ahead of him.

    FRIDAY: Crucifixion
    Mt 27:1-66; Mk 15:1-47; Lk 22:66-23:56; Jn 18:28-19:37
    Following betrayal, arrest, desertion, false trials, denial, condemnation, beatings and mockery, Jesus was required to carry his cross to “The Place of the Skull,” where he was crucified with two other prisoners.

    Friday before 6pm to Sunday Morning: In the tomb
    Jesus’ body was placed in the tomb before 6:00 P.M. Friday night, when the Sabbath began and all work stopped, and it lay in the tomb throughout the Sabbath.

    SUNDAY: Resurrection
    Mt 28:1-13; Mk 16:1-20; Lk 24:1-49; Jn 20:1-31
    Early in the morning, women went to the tomb and found that the stone closing the tomb’s entrance had been rolled back. An angel told them Jesus was alive and gave them a message. Jesus appeared to Mary Magdalene in the garden, to Peter, to two disciples on the road to Emmaus, and later that day to all the disciples but Thomas. His resurrection was established as a fact.

    The answer to the question on the discrepancies in the four resurrection narratives on the same encyclopedia is also very helpful to clarify the confusion on this issue. I have extracted it here for your reference:

    Do not the many discrepancies in the four Resurrection narratives cast doubt on the historicity of the Resurrection itself?

    Each of the four Evangelists contributes valuable details concerning the events of the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. Not all these distinctive items of information are contained in all four Gospels; some are contained only in one or two. But nothing could be clearer than that all four were testifying to the same epoch-making event, that the same Jesus who was crucified on Good Friday rose again in His crucified body on Easter Sunday morning. The very fact that each of the four writers contributed individual details from his own perspective and emphasis furnishes the most compelling type of evidence possible for the historicity of Christ’s conquest over death and the grave. A careful examination of these four records in comparison with one another demonstrates that they are not in any way contradictory, despite the charges leveled by some critics. It is helpful to synthesize all four accounts in order to arrive at a full picture of what took place on Easter itself and during the weeks that intervened until the ascension of Christ.

    The Women’s First Visit to the Tomb

    On Saturday evening three of the women decided to go back to the tomb belonging to Joseph of Arimathea, where they had seen Christ’s body laid away on Friday at sundown. They wanted to rewrap His corpse with additional spices, beyond those which Nicodemus and Joseph had already used on Friday. There were three women involved (Mark 16:1): Mary Magdalene, Mary the wife (or mother) of James, and Salome (Luke does not give their names; Matthew refers only to the two Marys); and they had bought the additional spices with their own means (Mark 16:1). They apparently started their journey from the house in Jerusalem while it was still dark (skotias eti ouses), even though it was already early morning (proi) (John 20:1). But by the time they arrived, dawn was glimmering in the east (te epiphoskouse) that Sunday morning (eis mian sabbaton) (Matt. 28:1). (Mark 16:2, Luke 24:1, John 20:1 all use the dative: te mia ton sabbaton.) Mark 16:2 adds that the tip of the sun had actually appeared above the horizon (anateilantos tou heliou–aorist participle; the Beza codex uses the present participle, anatellontos, implying “while the sun was rising”).

    It may have been while they were on their way to the tomb outside the city wall that the earthquake took place, by means of which the angel of the Lord rolled away the great circular stone that had sealed the entrance of the tomb. So blinding was his glorious appearance that the guards specially assigned to the tomb were completely terrified and swooned away, losing all consciousness (Matt. 28:2-4). The earthquake could hardly have been very extensive; the women seemed to be unaware of its occurrence, whether it happened before they left Jerusalem or while they were walking toward their destination. There is no evidence that it damaged anything it the city itself. But it was sufficient to break the seal placed over the circular stone at the time of interment and roll the stone itself away from its settled position in the downward slanting groove along which it rolled.

    The three women were delightfully surprised to find their problem of access to the tomb solved; the stone had already been rolled away (Mark 16:3-4)! They then entered the tomb, side-stepping the unconscious soldiers. In the tomb they made out the form of the leading angel, appearing as a young man with blazing white garments (Mark 16:5), who, however, may not have shown himself to them until they first discovered that the corpse was gone (Luke 24:2-3). But then it became apparent that this angel had a companion, for there were two of them in the tomb. The leading angel spoke to them with words of encouragement, “Don’t be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus who was crucified” (Matt. 28:5). Nevertheless they were quite terrified at the splendor of these heavenly visitors and by the amazing disappearance of the body they had expected to find in the tomb.

    The angel went on: “Why do you seek the living among [lit., `with'-- meta with the genitive] those who are dead? He is not here, but He has risen [Luke 24:5-6], just as He said [Matt. 28:6]. Look at the place where they laid Him [Mark 16:6], the place where He was lying [Matt. 28:6]. Remember how He told you when He was still in Galilee, saying that the Son of Man had to be betrayed into the hands of sinful men, crucified, and rise again on the third day” (Luke 24:6-7).

    After the angel had said this, the women in fact did remember Christ’s prediction (especially at Caesarea Philippi); and they were greatly encouraged. Then the angel concluded with this command: “Go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead!” Then he added: “Behold, He goes before you into Galilee; there you will see Him. Lo, I have told you” (Matt. 28:7). Upon receiving these wonderful tidings, the three delighted messengers set out in haste to rejoin the group of sorrowing believers back in the city (possibly in the home of John Mark) and pass on to them the electrifying news. They did not pause to inform anyone else as they hurried back (Mark 16:8), partly because they were fearful and shaken by their encounter at the empty tomb. But in their eagerness to deliver their tidings, they actually ran back to the house (Matt. 28:8) and made their happy announcement to the disciples who were gathered there.

    Mary Magdalene took pains to seek out Peter and John first of all; and she breathlessly blurted out to them, “They have taken the Lord away from the tomb, and we don’t know where they have laid Him!” (John 20:2). She apparently had not yet taken in the full import of what the angel meant when he told her that the Lord had risen again and that He was alive. In her confusion and amazement, all she could think of was that the body was not there; and she did not know what had become of it. Where could that body now be? It was for this reason that she wanted Peter and John to go back there and see what they could find out.

    Peter and John at the Tomb

    The synoptic Gospels do not mention this episode, but it was extremely important to John, who therefore took pains to record it in detail. As the two men got closer to Joseph’s tomb, they began to run in their eagerness to get there and see what had happened (John 20:3-4). John arrived there first, being no doubt younger and faster than Peter. Yet it turned out that he was not as perceptive as Peter, for all John did when he got to the entrance was stoop down and look into the tomb, where he saw the shroud, or winding sheet, of Jesus lying on the floor (v.5). But Peter was a bit bolder and more curious; he went inside the chamber and found it indeed empty. Then he looked intently at the winding sheet, because it way lying in a very unusual position. Instead of being spread out in a long, jumbled strip, it was still all wrapped together in one spot (entetyligmenon eis hena topon). Moreover, the soudarion (”long kerchief”) that had been wound around the head of Jesus was unwound and tossed on the shroud but was still wrapped together and lying right above it (vv. 6-7).

    In other words, no one had removed the graveclothes from the corpse in the usual way; it was as if the body had simply passed right out of the headcloth and shroud and left them empty! This was such a remarkable feature that Peter called John back and pointed out to him. All of a sudden it dawned on the younger man that no one had removed the body from that tomb. The body had simply left the tomb and left the graveclothes on its own power, passing through all those layers of cloth without unwrapping them at all! Then John was utterly convinced: Jesus had not been removed by other hands; He had raised Himself from the dead. That could only mean He was alive again. John and Peter decided to hurry back and report to the others this astounding evidence that Jesus had indeed conquered death and was alive once more.

    The Private Interviews With the Women and With Peter

    For some reason, Peter and John did not tell Mary Magdalene about what they had deduced before they left. Perhaps they did not even realize that she had followed along behind them at her slower pace. In fact, she may not have gotten back to the tomb until they had already left. She arrived all alone, but she did not immediately reenter until she had paused to weep for a little while. Then she stooped down once more to look through her tear-stained eyes into the tomb (John 20:11). To her astonishment it was ablaze with light; and there she beheld two angels in splendid white robes, sitting at each end of the place where Jesus had lain (v.12). Immediately they–the very same pair that had spoken to the three women at their earlier visit–asked her wonderingly, “Why are you crying?” Had she not understood the glorious news they had told her the first time? But all Mary could think about was the disappearance of Christ’s body. “They have taken my Lord away, and I don’t know where they have laid Him,” she lamented. To this the angels did not need to give any answer, for they could see the figure of Jesus standing behind her; and they knew His response would be better than anything they could say.

    Mary could sense that someone else had joined her, and so she quickly turned around and tried to make out through her tear-blurred eyes who this stranger might be. It wasn’t one of her own group, she decided; so it had to be the gardener who cared for this burial ground of Joseph of Arimathea. Even when He spoke to her, Mary did not at first recognize Jesus’ voice, as He kindly asked her, “Woman, why are you crying? Whom are you looking for?” (v.15). All she could do was wail at Him accusingly, “Sir, if it is you who have taken Him away, tell me where you have laid Him; and I will carry Him off”–as if somehow her womanly strength would be equal to such a task.

    It was at this point that the kindly stranger revealed Himself to Mary by reverting to His familiar voice as He addressed her by name, “Mariam!” Immediately she realized that the body she was looking for stood right before her, no longer a corpse but now a living, breathing human being–and yet more than that, the incarnate God. “Rabbouni!” she exclaimed (that is to say, “Master!”) and cast herself at His feet. It was only for a brief moment that she touched Him; for He gently withdrew Himself from her, saying, “Don’t keep touching Me [the negative imperative me mou haptou implies discontinuance of an action already begun], for I have not yet ascended to My Father.” Whether He did so later that afternoon and then returned afterward to speak to the two disciples on the road to Emmaus and the rest of the group back in Jerusalem that evening is not altogether clear. But if Mary was asked not to touch Him at this point in the day and the disciples were freely permitted to touch Him that evening, it must be inferred that He did report briefly back to God the Father in heaven before returning to earth once more for His postresurrection forty-day ministry.

    This private interview with the risen Lord did not continue much longer, so far as Mary was concerned; for He commissioned her to hurry back to the group in the city and prepare them for His coming to join them in His resurrection body. “Go to My brethren” He said, “and tell them I am going up to My Father and your Father, My God and your God” (John 20:17). This definitely confirms the deduction that Christ did in fact make a brief visit to heaven during the middle of Easter Sunday before reappearing to Cleopas and his companion on the Emmaus road.

    Nevertheless Jesus did not make His ascent to heaven at this precise moment, for He waited around long enough to meet with the other two women who had earlier accompanied Magdalene to the tomb at daybreak. Apparently Mary the mother (or wife) of James, and Salome with her, had decided to go back once more to visit the empty tomb. Presumably they noticed that Mary Magdalene had slipped away again after conferring with Peter and John, and they must have guessed where she had gone. Very soon after Magdalene had left Jesus and headed back toward the city (but not so soon that they actually met one another on the way), the two women drew near to the same spot where they had encountered the two angels on their first visit (Luke 24:4).

    We are not told whether the women actually entered the tomb once again, or whether they met Jesus just outside; but at any rate He apparently accosted them after they had arrived, and He greeted them (Matt. 28:9). (The Greek chairete here probably represents either the Hebrew salom or the Aramaic se lama’. Literally the Greek means “Rejoice!” Whereas the Hebrew means “Peace!”) Their reaction at seeing their risen Lord was similar to Magdalene’s; they cast themselves at His feet and kissed them as they clung to Him. Jesus reassured them as they were adjusting to the shock of seeing Him alive again, “Don’t be afraid.” Then He continued with a mandate similar to the one He had given to Magdalene: “Go and pass on the word [apangeilate] to My brethren that they are to depart for Galilee, and there they will see Me.”

    It is highly significant that our Lord first revealed Himself in His resurrection body, not to the men, the eleven disciples themselves, but rather to three of the women among the group of believers. Apparently He found that they were even readier in their spiritual perception than the eleven men of His inner circle, on whom He had spent so much of His time during the three years of His teaching ministry. Be that as it may, it seems quite clear that Jesus chose to honor the women with His very first postresurrection appearances before He revealed Himself to any of the men–even to Peter himself.

    Yet we must gather that Peter was the first of the male disciples to see his Lord alive after the Resurrection; for at some time after Mary Magdalene came back from her second visit to the tomb and her confrontation with Jesus there, Simon Peter must have had a personal reunion with Jesus. This we learn from Luke 24:34, where we are told that the disciples in the house of John Mark in Jerusalem had learned from Peter that he had already seen Jesus and had talked with Him, even before the two travelers returned from their journey toward Emmaus and reported back that they had broken bread with Jesus at the inn. They found as they came back with their exciting news and expected everyone there to be surprised at their account of talking with the risen Lord that the rest of the group were already aware of the stupendous event. The two travelers were delighted to meet with ready acceptance by all who heard them, for they were assured by all their friends, “Yes, yes, we know that Jesus is alive and has returned to us; for He has appeared to Simon Peter as well” (Luke 24:34). Presumably they were already aware (cf. v.22) of the earlier interviews reported to them by Mary Magdalene (who told them, “I have seen the Lord,” and then relayed His announcement about ascending to the Father in heaven; cf. John 20:18) and by the other Mary and her companion, Salome, who had passed on His instructions about the important rendezvous to be held up in Galilee.

    As for this personal interview between Christ and Peter, we have no further information; so we cannot be certain as to whether it was before or after His ascension to the Father and His subsequent return in the afternoon of Easter Sunday. All we can be sure of (and even this is perhaps arguable) is that He talked with Peter before He met with Cleopas and the other disciple on the road to Emmaus. It is interesting to note that Paul confirms that Christ did in fact appear to Peter before He revealed Himself to the rest of the Eleven (1 Cor. 15:5).

    The Interview With the Disciples on the Way to Emmaus

    The next major development on that first Easter Sunday involved two disciples who were not of the Eleven (the number to which they were reduced after the defection of Judas Iscariot). Cleopas was relatively undistinguished among the outer circle of Jesus’ following; at least he is hardly mentioned elsewhere in the New Testament record. As for his companion, we are never even told what his name was, even though he shared in the distinction of being the first to walk with Christ after His resurrection. Jesus apparently chose these two disciples outside the circle of the Eleven in order to make it clear to all of His church that He was equally available or accessible to all believers who would put their trust in Him as Lord and Savior, whether or not they belonged to any special circle or had come to know Him at an earlier or a later date. Perhaps He also felt that for their future testimony to the world–that they had become convinced of His bodily resurrection even in the face of their initial assumption that He was already dead and gone–such a manifestation would be of special helpfulness to future generations.

    One thing is certain: a true believer does not have to belong to the original band of chosen apostles in order to experience a complete transformation of life and the embracing of a new understanding that life with Jesus endures forever, in spite of all the adversities of this life and the malignity of Satan and the terrors of the grave. The Emmaus travelers replied, “Did not our hearts glow within us on the way and as He opened the Scriptures to us?” (Luke 24:32). They thus became the first example of what it means to walk with Jesus in living fellowship and hear Him speak from every part of the Hebrew Scriptures.

    This account is contained only in the Gospel of Luke, that Evangelist who took such special interest in the warm and tender personal relationships that Jesus cultivated with individual believers, both male and female. We may be very grateful to him (and the Holy Spirit who guided him) that this heart-stirring record was included in the testimonies of Jesus’ resurrection; for this encounter more fully than the others shows how life may be transformed from discouragement and disappointed hope into a richly satisfying and fruitful walk of faith with a wonderful Savior who has conquered sin and death for all who put their trust in Him.

    One interesting feature about this interview deserves comment. As in the case of Mary Magdalene, Jesus did not appear to the Emmaus travelers at the first with His customary form, features, or voice; and they failed to recognize His identity. They took Him for a stranger who was new to Jerusalem (Luke 24:18). It was not until after He had taught them how the Old Testament had clearly foretold how Messiah would first have to suffer before entering into His glory–and indeed not until after they had sat down for a bite to eat at some roadside cafe and heard Him give thanks to God for the food–that they realized who He was. And then, at the moment of recognition, He suddenly left them, vanishing from their sight. This sudden disappearance showed them that this new friend of theirs, who had flesh and bones and could use His hands to break bread with them, was a supernatural Being. He was the God-man who had triumphed over death and had risen from the grave to resume His bodily form, a marvelous new body with power to appear and disappear according to His will and purpose, as He saw fit.

    As soon as Jesus had left them, the two wayfarers sped back to Jerusalem as fast as their legs could carry them. They lost no time in making their way to the assembled believers and sharing with them the electrifying news of their lengthy encounter with the risen Lord. “And they began to relate their experiences on the road, and how He was recognized by them in the breaking of the bread.”

    The Interviews With the Assembled Disciples

    Luke tells us that while the Emmaus travelers were finishing their report the assembled believers, the Lord Himself entered through the locked doors and appeared in their midst (Luke 24:36), much to the amazement of all those who had not previously seen Him risen from the dead. Graciously He greeted them with His customary “Peace be with you” (the Greek eirene hymin doubtless represents the Aramaic selama’ `ammekon [John 20:19]). Then He hastened to allay their fears by showing them physical evidence of His bodily resurrection and restoration to life. “Why are you troubled and why do doubts arise in your heart?” He asked (Luke 24:38), as He held out His pierced hands for them to see and removed His sandals to show the nail holes through His feet (vv. 39-40). He even uncovered the scar of the gash that the Roman spear had made in His side as He hung lifeless on the cross (John 20:20). “Look at My hands and feet,” He said to them, “for it is really I. Feel Me and see, for a mere spirit does not have flesh and bones such as you behold Me to have” (Luke 24:39).

    How many took advantage of Christ’s offer to touch Him, we cannot be sure. But numbers of those in the room found even this evidence too amazing to be believed; so He offered a yet more dramatic proof. “Do you have anything to eat?” He asked them. They gave Him a piece of broiled fish, and He proceeded to eat it as they looked on with wonder and delight (Luke 24:42-43).

    Having thus demonstrated that He was none other than their beloved Master risen from the dead, Jesus proceeded to explain to them, as He had explained to the two on the road to Emmaus, that all the amazing occurrences of Passion Week were fully predicted in the Hebrew Scriptures–all the way from Genesis to Malachi. The portions referred to were threefold: Moses (i.e., the Pentateuch), the Prophets, and the Psalms. (Notice that by this period all the Old Testament books other than the Pentateuch and the Psalms were included under the classification of “Prophets”–including all the books of history, Daniel, and probably the wisdom books of Proverbs and Ecclesiastes as well, unless “Psalms” is intended to represent all five books of Poetry.) The entire Hebrew Bible is about the Son of God. But His particular focus was on those predictions of His ministry, sufferings, and death found in the Pentateuch (Gen. 3:15; 49:10; Deut. 18:15-18, and all the types of priesthood and sacrifice contained in the Torah), the Prophets (e.g., Isa. 7:14-9:6; 52:13-53:12), and the Psalms (esp. Ps. 16:10 and Ps. 22), which foretold all the events that found their culmination on this Easter Day (Luke 24:44-46). Thus He assured them that all the apparently tragic events of the last few days were in exact fulfillment of the great plan of human redemption that God had decreed from before the beginning of all time. Instead of feeling intimidated and disappointed by the shame of the Cross, they were to see in it the greatest victory of all time; and they were to trumpet abroad the good news of salvation, which by His atonement He had purchased for repentant sinners everywhere.

    This led Jesus quite naturally to the earliest pronouncement of the Great Commission. He told the disciples that repentance was to be preached in His name to all nations for the forgiveness of sins, beginning from Jerusalem, and that they as eyewitnesses were under special obligation to carry out the proclamation of this message. But He recognized that in order to accomplish this mission effectively, they would need divine empowerment, the special dynamic that God had promised in His Work (cf. Joel 2:28-29). Then He concluded His exhortation with this formula of evangelistic commission: “As the Father has sent Me, so do I send you.” Having said this, He breathed on them and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit” (John 20:22). Even in advance of the general bestowal of the Holy Spirit on the entire church at Pentecost, these apostles received Him as their permanently indwelling, sanctifying power. As temples for His residence, the apostles were entrusted with the awesome responsibility of conveying to the human race the knowledge of the Lord Jesus as the Way, the Truth, and the Life, without whom no one can come to God for salvation (John 14:6).

    As prophets of God, therefore, preachers and missionaries of the gospel, empowered and used by the Holy Spirit, were to make available to lost sinners everywhere the benefits of Calvary. But since man cannot believe the gospel until it has been presented to him, the availability of God’s forgiveness through Christ is practically limited to those evangelized by the faithful witness of His servants. In this sense, then, “if you forgive the sins [aphete tas hamartias] of any”–that is, by presenting them with Christ– “they have been forgiven them” (John 20:23, NASB). That is to say, they have been numbered among God’s elect according to His foreknowledge and elective grace (the Greek perfect passive apheontai so implies); and through the agency of God’s messengers of the gospel, they enter the ranks of the forgiven and redeemed. By the same token, however, those who remain unevangelized have no access to this forgiveness and salvation; and failure to get out the message to them seals their eternal doom. “If you retain the sins of any, they have been retained” (by God Himself, in His predestinative will), NASB. Christ had spoken of this solemn responsibility earlier, at the time of Peter’s confession of His messiahship; and there Jesus had symbolized it as the “power of the keys” (Matt. 16:19). It was at Pentecost, by his heart-stirring and conscience-piercing message, that Peter first used the power of the keys. With them he opened up the gateway to heaven to all the three thousand who believed.

    John records that of the Eleven, there was just one who was not present. Thomas (whose Greek name was Didymus– “Twin”). Perhaps it was providential that he had been absent during the initial meeting of the church with the resurrected Christ, for he might later have wondered whether he had not been unduly swayed in his critical judgment by the contagion of the enthusiasm of the others. Thomas was one who insisted on concrete, objective proof before he could be intellectually convinced. He had to be convinced almost against his will, for he firmly believed that once a man was dead, that was the end. How could a buried corpse ever come to life again? An impossible, absurd notion if he had ever heard one! Therefore he would not lend credence to the most solemn protestations of his trusted fellow disciples, that they had actually seen and talked with their resurrected Lord (John 20:25). Surely they must have fallen victim to mere hallucination!

    No one could ever expect Thomas to believe in anything so contrary to nature. Yet it was exactly one week later, on the Sunday following Easter, that Jesus appeared to the group for the second time (cf. John 21:14). This time Thomas was present, that stubborn skeptic who had declared, “Unless I see the print of the nails in His hands and put my finger into the place of the nails and put my hand into His side [i.e., where the spear had entered His chest], I will not believe” (John 20:25). As Jesus entered the room, again passing through the closed doors, He gave them the same general greeting as before: “Peace be unto you.” Then He went up to Thomas and stood before him, saying, “Reach here your finger and look at My hands, and reach your hand here and put it into My side; and be not faithless but believing.”

    The very type of proof Thomas had demanded was now presented to him in a way that could admit of no other explanation: the same body that had been crucified on the cross now stood alive before him. All of sudden, as Thomas touched the scar and nail prints with his hands, all of his hard-headed skepticism seemed foolish and unworthy. All he could do was fall to his knees in repentance and adoration as he exclaimed, “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28).

    We now pass to the third interview between Christ and His apostles subsequent to the Resurrection. By this time the disciples had left Jerusalem and had gone up to Galilee to keep their rendezvous with Him as He had bidden them (Matt. 28:10; Mark 16:7). This was a much less formal occasion, and only five of them were present–on the fishing expedition at least (Peter, Thomas, Nathanael, James, and John). It was Peter’s idea to go fishing, for might help to relieve some of the tension of waiting for the Lord to appear to them. There is no good reason to infer, as some have done, that Peter was intending to leave his apostolic calling and go back to his old job as a fisherman. Even in our own day many a full-time pastor occasionally relaxes by following Peter’s example. From Peter’s scanty attire (John 21:7), we gather that it was a hot summer night; and may have been hard to sleep. At any rate, they all went out with Peter and caught absolutely nothing.

    Finally, as the dawn mist came on them, they made out the form of a bystander greeting them from the shore. “Children,” He called out to them, “You don’t have anything to eat, have you?” “No”, they answered Him. “Well then,” the stranger shouted, “throw your net on the right-hand side of the boat, and you will have catch!” This seemed very unlikely, but they complied nevertheless. Immediately the net ropes began to jerk and pull about this way and that, and it seemed as if they had run into a whole school of unwary fish. John immediately recognized that this was a special work of God; only Jesus could turn such dismal failure into thrilling success. “It is the Lord,” he exclaimed.

    The rest of the story is so well known, it is unnecessary to repeat it all here. But the important feature about the incident so far as John was concerned–and he makes it the final item in his gospel–was the correlation between love and service. “Simon, if you love Me, feed My sheep.” Love for Jesus was absolutely foundational. Jesus compelled Peter to reaffirm his love for Him three times–corresponding to the number of times he had denied Him in the palace of the high priest. Nothing Peter might do for the Lord would satisfy or please Him unless it was based on an all-consuming personal affection and commitment to Him, in sincere fulfillment of the first and great commandment. But if that love was real, it had to express itself in loving outreach to all of God’s people: Christ’s lambs and sheep (both children and adults). In Peter’s case, at least, Peter’s faithfulness to Jesus would some day mean his death on the scaffold or cross (John 21:18-19). As a lover of Christ, Peter also would have to be willing to lay down his life for his “friends.”

    There may have been numerous other times of fellowship between Christ and His apostles during the remainder of the forty-day period between the Easter resurrection and the ascension of our Lord to heaven recorded in Acts 1:9 Luke simply indicates that Jesus was repeatedly seen (optanomenos) by His disciples over a period of forty days, and He taught them “concerning the kingdom of God” (Acts 1:3). But the record of the Galilean retreat closes with a large assembly of Christ’s followers–quite possibly the gathering included more than five hundred at that time (cf. 1 Cor. 15:6)–on some mountain in Galilee (Matt. 28:16), which though unnamed may have been Tabor, the highest and most impressive hill in Galilee. There Jesus issued a stirring appeal for lives devoted to evangelism. He assured His disciples that the Father had committed to Him as the risen Messiah all authority (pasa exousia) in heaven and on earth; and even after His ascension to Glory, He would be with them always, to the very consummation of the age (Matt. 28:20). Their responsibility would be to go and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Triune God, and teaching them to observe all of His commandments. Matthew 28:19-20 gives us the fullest form of the Great Commission.

    The final day of Christ’s postresurrection ministry did not take place in Galilee. That may have been the site of the largest assembly of His followers, as we have just seen; but His actual departure was from the crest of the Mount of Olives, not far from Bethany. There was something especially fitting that this should be the point of His departure, since from the prophecy in Zechariah 14:4 we know that the Mount of Olives will be the place of His return in the day of Armageddon. As He sets His foot down there, a mighty earthquake will split the hill of Olivet into a broad valley running from west to east.

    We have no way of knowing how many of Jesus’ disciples gathered on the summit of Olivet for that last memorable interview with their Lord, on His final day of earthy ministry. Perhaps there were about 120 there, judging from the statement in Acts 1:15. It is conceivable that the “over five hundred brethren at once” (1 Cor. 15:6) were there rather than up in Galilee. Matthew 28:16 only mentions the Eleven as being certainly of that number; yet the Eleven may have simply been a core group, and a great many more may have gathered around them. On the other hand, if there were over 500 assembled at Olivet on Ascension Day, it is unlikely that 380 of them would have disregarded Christ’ solemn instructions and would have failed to tarry for the specified ten days until Pentecost (Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4), when the Spirit would descend from heaven on them.

    As the disciples gathered about Jesus to take their leave of Him before His departure to heaven, they asked Him one question of pressing importance: Will the kingdom of God very soon be established on earth? They were anxious to know what their Lord’s plan was for the triumph of His cause and establishment of His sovereignty over all the earth. In response to this question, Jesus does not correct their underlying premise–that He some day will establish the kingdom of God on earth–but indicates that there will be intervening times and seasons in phraseology reminiscent of the Olivet Discourse (Matt. 24:5-14), with its clear indication that much would have to happen before the present age would draw to its close. It was unnecessary and inappropriate for them to know about the exact date of the Second Advent; their task was simply to carry out the Great Commission and spread the gospel to the very ends of the earth (Acts 1:7-8).

    As His final gesture there on the hilltop near Bethany, our Lord lifted His hands to bless His disciples (Luke 24:50); and in that attitude He was suddenly lifted up from the ground, to disappear from their sight beyond the clouds. As they stood there looking up, transfixed with wonder, two angels suddenly appeared beside them (perhaps the same angels who had greeted the visitors to the empty tomb) and assured them that Jesus would some day return to earth in bodily form–in the same form as they had seen Him ascend to heaven. With this glad assurance ringing in their ears, they made their way down from Olivet in order to spend the next ten days in communion and prayer, until the outpouring of Christ’s Holy Spirit came on them all at Pentecost.

    Reply

  27. Y H Koh’s avatar

    Back to question of whether Christians should observe Sabbath according to the ten commandments. I think there are two things to consider. First, if we are going to observe the Sabbath strictly according to the practice of the Jews, then, we should observe fully according to the law requirements. That is, according to how the Jews practices - not working on sabbath at all.
    Exo 20:8 Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy.
    Exo 20:10 but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your gates.
    Exo 31:15 For six days, work is to be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must be put to death.
    Exo 35:3 Do not light a fire in any of your dwellings on the Sabbath day. - That means no cooking.
    Num 28:9 ‘On the Sabbath day, make an offering of two lambs a year old without defect, together with its drink offering and a grain offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil.
    Num 28:10 This is the burnt offering for every Sabbath, in addition to the regular burnt offering and its drink offering.
    Deu 5:14 but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your ox, your donkey or any of your animals, nor the alien within your gates, so that your manservant and maidservant may rest, as you do.
    Are you practicing these requirements?

    How does our Lord observe the Sabbath?
    Mat 12:1 At that time Jesus went through the cornfields on the Sabbath. His disciples were hungry and began to pick some ears of corn and eat them.
    Mat 12:2 When the Pharisees saw this, they said to him, Look! Your disciples are doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath.
    Mat 12:3 He answered, Haven’t you read what David did when he and his companions were hungry?
    Mat 12:4 He entered the house of God, and he and his companions ate the consecrated bread– which was not lawful for them to do, but only for the priests.
    Mat 12:5 Or haven’t you read in the Law that on the Sabbath the priests in the temple desecrate the day and yet are innocent?
    Mat 12:6 I tell you that one greater than the temple is here.
    Mat 12:7 If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent.
    Mat 12:8 For the Son of Man is Lord of the Sabbath.
    Mat 12:9 Going on from that place, he went into their synagogue, and
    Mat 12:10 a man with a shrivelled hand was there. Looking for a reason to accuse Jesus, they asked him, Is it lawful to heal on the Sabbath?
    Mat 12:11 He said to them, If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out?
    Mat 12:12 How much more valuable is a man than a sheep! Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath.
    Mat 12:13 Then he said to the man, Stretch out your hand. So he stretched it out and it was completely restored, just as sound as the other.
    Mat 12:14 But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus.
    Luk 13:10 On a Sabbath Jesus was teaching in one of the synagogues,
    Luk 13:11 and a woman was there who had been crippled by a spirit for eighteen years. She was bent over and could not straighten up at all.
    Luk 13:12 When Jesus saw her, he called her forward and said to her, Woman, you are set free from your infirmity.
    Luk 13:13 Then he put his hands on her, and immediately she straightened up and praised God.
    Luk 13:14 Indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, the synagogue ruler said to the people, There are six days for work. So come and be healed on those days, not on the Sabbath.
    Luk 13:15 The Lord answered him, You hypocrites! Doesn’t each of you on the Sabbath untie his ox or donkey from the stall and lead it out to give it water?
    Luk 13:16 Then should not this woman, a daughter of Abraham, whom Satan has kept bound for eighteen long years, be set free on the Sabbath day from what bound her?
    Luk 13:17 When he said this, all his opponents were humiliated, but the people were delighted with all the wonderful things he was doing.

    You could find many more from the Scripture yourself.

    How does Paul discuss about observing a special day?

    Col 2:13 When you were dead in your sins and in the uncircumcision of your sinful nature, God made you alive with Christ. He forgave us all our sins,
    Col 2:14 having cancelled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross.
    Col 2:15 And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.
    Col 2:16 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.
    Col 2:17 These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.

    You are justified not by observing the Law but by the blood of Christ!

    So how should we treat the forth of the Ten Commendments?
    Exo 20:8 Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy.
    Exo 20:9 Six days you shall labour and do all your work,
    Exo 20:10 but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your gates.
    Exo 20:11 For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.

    Let’s look back to the big picture - the Ten Commendments - What did our Lord Jesus said?
    Mat 22:36 Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?
    Mat 22:37 Jesus replied: ‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’
    Mat 22:38 This is the first and greatest commandment.
    Mat 22:39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbour as yourself.’
    Mat 22:40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.

    How does Lord Jesus talk about keeping the Law?
    Mat 5:21 You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’
    Mat 5:22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, ‘Raca,’ is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.
    Mat 5:23 Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you,
    Mat 5:24 leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift.
    Mat 5:25 Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still with him on the way, or he may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison.
    Mat 5:26 I tell you the truth, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.
    Mat 5:27 You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’
    Mat 5:28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
    Mat 5:29 If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell.
    Mat 5:30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell.
    Mat 5:31 It has been said, ‘Anyone who divorces his wife must give her a certificate of divorce.’
    Mat 5:32 But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulteress, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.
    Mat 5:33 Again, you have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not break your oath, but keep the oaths you have made to the Lord.’
    Mat 5:34 But I tell you, Do not swear at all: either by heaven, for it is God’s throne;
    Mat 5:35 or by the earth, for it is his footstool; or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King.
    Mat 5:36 And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make even one hair white or black.
    Mat 5:37 Simply let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes’, and your ‘No’, ‘No’; anything beyond this comes from the evil one.
    Mat 5:38 You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’
    Mat 5:39 But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
    Mat 5:40 And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.
    Mat 5:41 If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.
    Mat 5:42 Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you.
    Mat 5:43 You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbour and hate your enemy.’
    Mat 5:44 But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,
    Mat 5:45 that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.
    Mat 5:46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that?
    Mat 5:47 And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that?
    Mat 5:48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

    Back to keeping the Sabbath - As a Christian, the sabbath is no longer just one of the 7 days you need to keep it holy. In fact, all the 24 hours each day for the 7 days of the week, you are to keep them holy because you are holy as God is holy. You are no longer belonging to yourself, you are redeemed by Christ.

    Rom 12:1 Therefore, I urge you, brothers, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God– this is your spiritual act of worship.
    Rom 12:2 Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God’s will is– his good, pleasing and perfect will.

    Reply

  28. Sicarii’s avatar

    hi YH,

    Welcome to my blog and thank you for your comments.

    I have yet to get some time to really go through your comments, so I am dropping a note now to let you know I’ll be running a little late with a proper response. My apologies.

    Will get back to you soon. :-)
    God bless, and Shalom!

    Reply

  29. Y H Koh’s avatar

    Hi, Sicarii,

    Greetings!

    I have found a more detail explaination from the Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties that could clear your confusion:

    How can Sunday replace Saturday under the fourth commandment?

    In Exodus 20:8 God’s people are commanded: “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.” The seventh day of the week is to commemorate the completion of God’s work of creation ( v.11 concludes, “The LORD…rested the seventh day; wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it”). This commandment ranks with the nine others to form the Decalogue, and there is no suggestion even in the New Testament that the Ten Commandments are not binding on the conscience of Christian believers or that the number has been reduced to nine rather than ten. In the absence of any divine instruction to the contrary, we may assume that the fourth commandment is still binding on us. But the real question at issue is whether the sanction of the seventh day Sabbath has been by the New Testament transferred to the first day of the week, which the Christian church generally (apart from sabbatarian groups) honors as the Lord’s Day, otherwise known as the Christian Sabbath.

    New Testament Evidence for Sunday Worship

    The heart of the apostolic manifesto to the Jewish and Gentile world from Pentecost onward was the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ: “This Jesus God raised up again, to which we are all witnesses” (Acts 2:32, NASB). The bodily resurrection was God’s certification to the world that the Savior of mankind had paid a valid and sufficient price for sinners and that He had for them overcome the curse of death. Christ’s effectual atoning sacrifice and conquest over sin and death ushered in a new era, the age of the New Testament church. As the Lord’s Supper replaced the Old Testament sacrament of the Passover, as the death of Christ replaced the sacrifice of animal offerings on the altar, as the high priesthood of Christ “after the order of Melchizedek” replaced the priesthood of Aaron and constituted every born-again believer as a priest of God, so also in the case of this one commandment out of the ten, which was in part at least ceremonial, there was to be a change in the symbol appropriate to the new dispensation, as the following facts seem to teach.

    1. Jesus rose from the dead on the first day of the week, according to all four Evangelists (Matt. 28:1; Mark 16:2; Luke 24:1; John 20:1). Thus Sunday took on special importance as the weekly day of celebration for the triumph of the Resurrection.

    2. Jesus personally appeared to his followers in visible, bodily form and conversed with them on Easter Sunday. (1) He first appeared to Mary Magdalene (John 20:11-18). (2) He next appeared to the other women who had brought spices for the embalming of His Body (Matt. 28:7-10). (3) He appeared personally to Simon Peter (Luke 24:34). (4) He walked and talked with Cleopas and his companion on the road to Emmaus (Luke 24:15-32). (5) He appeared to the ten disciples and their friends on that same Sunday evening–His first appearance to a gathered assembly of Christian believers.

    3. Exactly one week later, on a Sunday night, Jesus again appeared to His disciples; and this time the skeptical Thomas (who had been absent on the previous Sunday) was on hand. To him Jesus presented the physical evidence of His nail-pierced hands and feet and His spear-stabbed side in order to convince Thomas that He was alive again and was going about in the same body that had been crucified on Good Friday.

    4. The outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the church took place on Pentecost. Since the Crucifixion took place on a Friday, the offering of the wave-sheaf (typical of the Resurrection) took place on the “morrow after the sabbath” (Lev. 23:10-11)–on a Sunday. This means that forty-nine days later, the Feast of Weeks (known in Greek as Pentekoste, “Fiftieth [Day]“) fell also on a Sunday. Obviously it was the Lord Himself who chose to honor Sunday by bringing about both the Easter victory and the “birthday” of the New Testament church on the first day of the week.

    After Pentecost it seems that the Christian community continued to celebrate the seventh-day Sabbath as before, by gathering with other Jews (both converted and unconverted) for the reading of the Torah, for preaching, and for prayer. But there is no demonstrable reference to Christians ever gathering on the Saturday Sabbath to celebrate the Lord’s Supper or to hold a distinctively Christian assembly. They joined in synagogue worship on Saturdays because they felt themselves to be Jews, even though they believed in Christ. In fact, they believed that they were better and more authentic Jews than those who had rejected the Hope of Israel. But they also met on Sunday mornings for worship and Holy Communion, and quite possibly on Sunday evening as well, when they had more preaching and the partaking of the agape meal, or “love feast” (Acts 20:5-12).

    5. In 1 Corinthians 16:2, Paul gave this instruction to the Corinthian church: “On the first day of every week let each of you put aside [lit., `put by himself'] and save, as he may prosper, that no collections be made when I come” (NASB). The collection referred to was the relief fund for starving Hebrew Christians of Judea who were so hard hit by famine. Paul could hardly have been referring to a habit of saving carried on simply in private homes, for there would then have been no point to his referring to any one special day of the week. Anyone who is saving up for some special cause and setting the money aside in a “piggy bank” would be free to do so on any day of the week. He would hardly be expected to wait until Sunday to touch his private piggy bank. The only plausible basis for mentioning a particular day of the week was so that they might all contribute to the benevolence treasury (note the use of the word thesaurizon, “saving,” which really means “putting into a treasury [thesauros],” the very same term as was applied to the offering box set up in the court of the Jerusalem temple) according to what their income had been during the previous week (”as he may prosper”), presumably the 10 percent prescribed by the Old Testament. This pooling of their individual contributions into a common receptacle would enable them to amass a considerable sum for famine relief. With all these factors in view, it is safe for us to conclude that the Corinthian church was in the habit of meeting on Sundays and that they took up offerings of some sort in connection with those Sunday worship services.

    6. After Paul had spent an entire week at Troas, according to Acts 20:5-12, he concluded his stay with the Christian community there by presiding at their Sunday evening service. This could hardly have been a special meeting held for evangelistic or Bible-conference purposes, for otherwise there would have been no discernible motive for him to tarry there for seven days (v.6). Paul was quite pressed for time, since he had to make it to Jerusalem in time for the annual Feast of Pentecost (Acts 20:16). We must therefore conclude that he waited until the regular Sunday evening service at Troas so that he might have as large a congregation as possible. (There can be no legitimate question as to whether “first day of the week” could have referred to Saturday evening–as some have argued–since Troas was a city of major size and commercial importance, and it was beyond question predominantly Gentile. Therefore for them the “first day of the week” would have begun at midnight, as it did for the Roman world, and as it does for us today.) Paul then preached to a packed church at the upper story level; and they protracted the meeting all night until the dawn of Monday morning, when they held a simple love feast together before saying goodby (Acts. 20:11). The institution of Sunday worship was firmly entrenched at Troas and obviously approved of by Paul.

    7. The final New Testament reference to Sunday as a day of special meaning to Christians is to be found in Revelation 1:10: “I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, and I heard behind me a loud voice like the sound of a trumpet” (NASB). The voice was that of the glorified Christ Himself, who had come to commune with John on Sunday. “The Lord’s Day” is expressed in the dative case: te kyriake hemera. There is no valid ground for questioning whether this really referred to Sunday. To this very day it is the regular word for “Sunday” in modern Greek, and it is plainly so intended in the earliest postbiblical witnesses (Didache 14:1, first quarter of the second century; Epistle of Barnabas 15:1, early second century). Justin Martyr (mid-second century) describes a typical order of service at a Christian service “on the day called Sunday” (First Apology 67). In his Dialogue with Trypho (a Jew), Justin argues that the command in Genesis 17 to circumcise an infant “on the eight day” was in tended by God as “a type of the true circumcision, by which we are circumcised from deceit and iniquity through Him who rose from the dead on the first day after the Sabbath, our Lord Jesus Christ” (Chap. 41). By the early third century, Tertullian went so far as to insist that “we [Christians] have nothing to do with the sabbaths or other Jewish festivals, much less with those of the heathen. We have our own solemnities, the Lord’s Day, for instance, and Pentecost” (On Idolatry 14). In De Oratione (23) Tertullian urged the cessation of labor on Sunday so that it might be preserved as a day of worship for God’s people.

    A very interesting testimony is found in the Syriac The Teaching of the Apostles, dating from the second half of the third century, to the effect that Christ’s apostles were the first to designate the first day of the week as the day for Christian worship. “The Apostles further appointed: On the first day of the week let there be service, and the reading of the Holy Scriptures, and the oblation: because on the first day of the week our Lord rose from the dead, and on the first day of the week He ascended up to heaven, and on the first day of the week He will appear at last with the angels of heaven” (Ante-Nicene Fathers 8.668). (For most of the quotations from the church fathers, I an indebted to Henry Waterman’s fine article “The Lord’s Day” [Tenney, Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia, 3:965-66].)

    In the light of these early Christian testimonies, we can see the unsoundness of the contention made by some sabbatarian advocates that Sunday was not chosen to supercede Saturday as the day of Christian worship until the time of Constantine the Great (308-37). From apostolic times Sunday has been recognized by Christians as a day of worship and a day of rest. But what Constantine did was to issue a special edict prescribing Sunday as the official day of rest each week throughout the Roman Empire.

    Sanctifying the Lord’s Day

    Now that we have covered the New Testament basis for the adoption of the first day of the week as the distinctive day of worship for Christians, we turn our attention to the question of how the Lord’s Day was–and is–to be sanctified by God’s people. If our initial premise is correct and the Lord’s Day is basically intended to perpetuate the special sanctity of the Sabbath, then it would follow that our reverence for Sunday should be equal to that of the ancient Hebrew believer for the seventh-day Sabbath.

    How is the Lord’s Day to be sanctified? Well, if we consult the Decalogue, we find that it is to be marked by a cessation from self-serving, gainful employment that would be quite proper for the other six days of the week (Exod. 20:9-10). It is also, according to Leviticus 23:3, to be a day of public worship, a “holy convocation,” and a day of special significance for the officiating priests. They were to replace the old showbread with fresh new loaves on the “table before the LORD” in the sanctuary (Lev. 24:8), and they were to double the normal offering on the altar of sacrifice (the “continual burnt offering”) according to Numbers 28:9-10. But the most illuminating passage in the Old Testament concerning the true celebration of the Sabbath is found in Isaiah 58:13-14: “If because of the Sabbath, you turn your foot from doing your own pleasure on My holy day, and call the sabbath a delight, the holy day of the LORD honorable, and shall honor it, desisting from your own ways, from seeking your own pleasure, and speaking your own words, then you will take delight in the LORD, and I will make you ride on the heights of the earth” (NASB).

    Much of the concept conveyed by that passage found classic expression in the Westminster Shorter Catechism (60): “How is the [Christian] Sabbath to be sanctified? The Sabbath is to be sanctified by a holy resting all that day, even from such worldly employments and recreations as are lawful on other days; and spending the whole time in the public and private exercises of God’s worship, except so much as is to be taken up in the works of necessity and mercy (Matt. 12:11-12).” This was the ideal standard of the Puritan movement, which represented the finest flower of the Protestant Reformation in the English-speaking world. While that standard is now more often honored by the breach than by observance, it would be difficult to prove that the modern permissive attitude towards hallowing the Lord’s Day has any foundation in Scripture.

    It is often urged by those who advocate pure voluntarism in the use of Sunday that Colossians 2:16 abolishes almost all the sanctions of the Old Testament fourth commandment. This verse says, “Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day” (NIV). A more accurate rendering of sabbaton would be “Sabbaths”–plural rather than singular. This is important here, for the Hebrew religious calendar possessed not only seventh-day Sabbaths but also feast-day Sabbaths, which were to be celebrated in exactly the same way as the Saturday Sabbath, regardless of what day in the week the first and last days of the feast might fall (especially in regard to the Feast of Unleavened Bread and the Feast of Tabernacles, both of which ran for eight days).

    The general purport of Colossians 2:16 is that the distinctive holy days of the Old Testament are no longer binding on New Testament believers because “these are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ” (v.17). Hence v.16 would seem to be referring primarily to obsolete Old Testament ordinances, of which the seventh-day Sabbath was one, and probably the feast-day Sabbath was another.

    There is no good reason to believe that Paul intended to include the Christian form of the fourth commandment, that is, Sunday observance, as among the “shadows” that had already been fulfilled by Christ; the observance of the Lord’s Day could hardly be classified as an Old Testament “shadow.” In point of fact, it was a contemporary Christian ordinance zealously observed by those who trusted in Christ, the “Reality” (soma literally means “body”), rather than in obsolete or obsolescent Old Testament types (or “shadows”). Therefore, it is altogether unwarranted to draw from this verse an unrestrained license to use the Lord’s Day any way one pleases. Church attendance and group Bible study are admittedly the most important elements in Sunday observance, but the principle of rest from self-seeking labor (except for those involved in works of real necessity or mercy) is surely at the heart of hallowing the Lord’s Day–even in these days when the secularized culture around us holds that day in very low esteem.

    For additional study of this topic see D.A. Carson, From Sabbath to Lord’s Day (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1982).

    Reply

  30. Michaela’s avatar

    Does it really matter what day we have the Sabbath as long as we Sabbath? I don’t think God gets hung up on days of the week. My Sabbath is definately not Sunday because I do a lot of work in my church. I Sabbath on Friday or Saturday.

    Reply